Adolf.Hitler. .Mein.Kampf.(osloskop.net)

Podstrony

[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Even then we shall not be able to do without those corporations which at present we call parliaments.Butthey will be real councils, in the sense that they will have to give advice.The responsibility can and must beborne by one individual, who alone will be vested with authority and the right to command.Parliaments as such are necessary because they alone furnish the opportunity for leaders to rise gradually whowill be entrusted subsequently with positions of special responsibility.The following is an outline of the picture which the organization will present:From the municipal administration up to the government of the Reich, the People s State will not have anybody of representatives which makes its decisions through the majority vote.It will have only advisorybodies to assist the chosen leader for the time being and he will distribute among them the various duties theyare to perform.In certain fields they may, if necessary, have to assume full responsibility, such as the leaderor president of each corporation possesses on a larger scale.In principle the People s State must forbid the custom of taking advice on certain political problems economics, for instance from persons who are entirely incompetent because they lack special training andpractical experience in such matters.Consequently the State must divide its representative bodies into apolitical chamber and a corporative chamber that represents the respective trades and professions.To assure an effective co-operation between those two bodies, a selected body will be placed over them.Thiswill be a special senate.No vote will be taken in the chambers or senate.They are to be organizations for work and not votingmachines.The individual members will have consultive votes but no right of decision will be attachedthereto.The right of decision belongs exclusively to the president, who must be entirely responsible for thematter under discussion.This principle of combining absolute authority with absolute responsibility will gradually cause a selectedgroup of leaders to emerge; which is not even thinkable in our present epoch of irresponsibleparliamentarianism.The political construction of the nation will thereby be brought into harmony with those laws to which thenation already owes its greatness in the economic and cultural spheres.Regarding the possibility of putting these principles into practice, I should like to call attention to the fact thatthe principle of parliamentarian democracy, whereby decisions are enacted through the majority vote, has notalways ruled the world.On the contrary, we find it prevalent only during short periods of history, and thosehave always been periods of decline in nations and States.One must not believe, however, that such a radical change could be effected by measures of a purelytheoretical character, operating from above downwards; for the change I have been describing could not belimited to transforming the constitution of a State but would have to include the various fields of legislation241Mein Kampfand civic existence as a whole.Such a revolution can be brought about only by means of a movement whichis itself organized under the inspiration of these principles and thus bears the germ of the future State in itsown organism.Therefore it is well for the National Socialist Movement to make itself completely familiar with thoseprinciples to-day and actually to put them into practice within its own organization, so that not only will it bein a position to serve as a guide for the future State but will have its own organization such that it cansubsequently be placed at the disposal of the State itself.242Mein KampfCHAPTER VWELTANSCHHAUUNG AND ORGANIZATIONThe People s State, which I have tried to sketch in general outline, will not become a reality in virtue of thesimple fact that we know the indispensable conditions of its existence.It does not suffice to know what aspectsuch a State would present.The problem of its foundation is far more important.The parties which exist atpresent and which draw their profits from the State as it now is cannot be expected to bring about a radicalchange in the regime or to change their attitude on their own initiative.This is rendered all the moreimpossible because the forces which now have the direction of affairs in their hands are Jews here and Jewsthere and Jews everywhere.The trend of development which we are now experiencing would, if allowed togo on unhampered, lead to the realization of the Pan-Jewish prophecy that the Jews will one day devour theother nations and become lords of the earth.In contrast to the millions of bourgeois and proletarian Germans, who are stumbling to their ruin, mostlythrough timidity, indolence and stupidity, the Jew pursues his way persistently and keeps his eye always fixedon his future goal.Any party that is led by him can fight for no other interests than his, and his interestscertainly have nothing in common with those of the Aryan nations.If we would transform our ideal picture of the People s State into a reality we shall have to keep independentof the forces that now control public life and seek for new forces that will be ready and capable of taking upthe fight for such an ideal.For a fight it will have to be, since the first objective will not be to build up theidea of the People s State but rather to wipe out the Jewish State which is now in existence.As so oftenhappens in the course of history, the main difficulty is not to establish a new order of things but to clear theground for its establishment.Prejudices and egotistic interests join together in forming a common frontagainst the new idea and in trying by every means to prevent its triumph, because it is disagreeable to them orthreatens their existence.That is why the protagonist of the new idea is unfortunately, in spite of his {254}desire for constructive work,compelled to wage a destructive battle first, in order to abolish the existing state of affairs.A doctrine whose principles are radically new and of essential importance must adopt the sharp probe ofcriticism as its weapon, though this may show itself disagreeable to the individual followers.It is evidence of a very superficial insight into historical developments if the so-called folkists emphasizeagain and again that they will adopt the use of negative criticism under no circumstances but will engage onlyin constructive work.That is nothing but puerile chatter and is typical of the whole lot of folkists.It is anotherproof that the history of our own times has made no impression on these minds.Marxism too has had its aimsto pursue and it also recognizes constructive work, though by this it understands only the establishment ofdespotic rule in the hands of international Jewish finance.Nevertheless for seventy years its principal workstill remains in the field of criticism.And what disruptive and destructive criticism it has been! Criticismrepeated again and again, until the corrosive acid ate into the old State so thoroughly that it finally crumbledto pieces.Only then did the so-called constructive critical work of Marxism begin [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

zanotowane.pl

doc.pisz.pl

pdf.pisz.pl

bezglutenowo.pev.pl